“We have taken an historic decision on Article 18,” said Dr Adriana Blanco Marquizo, Head of the WHO FCTC Secretariat, describing action to strengthen the article of WHO FCTC focused on the protection of the environment and the health of all people.
“The decision urges Parties to take account of the environmental impacts from the cultivation, manufacture, consumption and waste disposal of tobacco products, and to strengthen the implementation of this article, including through national policies related to tobacco and protection of the environment.”
Laughably, Marquizo’s press release lays claim that the event was “open to the media, which had the opportunity to observe all public and open sessions, enabling reporters to witness more than 1000 delegates from around the world unite over six days to consider and take action on important issues related to implementation of the Convention.”
Euroreporter’s Political Editor Nick Powell tells a different tale: “Like many journalists, I was refused accreditation but that made little difference as the conference voted to exclude the press. That was shortly after the organisers cut off the microphone of a delegate who had the temerity to suggest that the priority should be harm reduction.”
Powell recounts an organisation in disarray, with arguments between evidence and anecdote – and complete fiction when it comes to the cancer risk of vaping.
So, without any agreement among the nations, what does the WHO do? It issues an edict based on the experience of one country, Laos.
“E-cigarettes as consumer products are not shown to be effective for quitting tobacco use,” says Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, laying claim to “mounting evidence” that reveals “alarming adverse health effects”.
Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus urged countries to implement “strict measures” against vapes and praised Laos’ “strong leadership and rapid action when it comes to e-cigarettes and legislation around them”.
Why yes, the same Laos that allows packs of cigarettes to go on sale for 25p each. The country with a vape ban rivalling the stupidity of its ban on “intimate relationships” between unmarried citizens and foreigners.
And where do the cheap cigarettes come from in Laos? Lao Tobacco Limited holds 77.3% of the home tobacco market - a joint venture between the government of Laos and the tobacco industry.
So, while the WHO praises Laos’ total ban of e-cigarettes, 7329 nationals die from smoking every year. The organisation cops out once more from telling the truth – or even calling out the lies of Parties signed up to the FCTC. The WHO remains unfit for purpose when it comes to tobacco harm reduction.
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia
A Missed Opportunity at COP10
The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives
COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction
Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10