Compliance submissions for vape products originally accepted as correct by the European Common Entry Gateway (EUCEG) may now not be enough, so manufacturers need to check that they have listed all necessary components.
The warning comes from Lee Bryan, managing director of Arcus Compliance Ltd, leading advisers to the vaping industry and many of its biggest brands.
Arcus Compliance was established in 2017 to help clients implement best-practice compliance. The company develops robust processes to support customers’ regulatory compliance and product stewardship while providing ongoing advice and education through online content.
The directors have more than 25 years’ collective experience across the vaping sector, serving some of the world’s best-known brands and working closely with decision-makers, regulatory bodies and enforcement agencies. Arcus Compliance is a full board member of the UK Vaping Industry Association and sits on the Standards and Membership committees.
After Britain’s exit from the EU, the MHRA invested in its own Submission Portal to keep a check on new vaping products, a process previously handled through the EUCEG.
Attention is now being turned to some 40,000 EUCEG submissions dating back to 2016 which required only signed declarations of conformity with the regulations rather than more in-depth validation.
The EUCEG submission process took on trust that a product did not breach the Tobacco Products Directive, such as a vaping recipe lacking toxicology data for all ingredients.
Bryan says: “An issue would only be flagged up if one of the competent authorities opened the submission and looked at it in detail. Without doubt, there are products on the market that require attention.
“We are now seeing many more brands being asked to provide more information – or being forced to exit the market.”
Bryan continues: “It’s somewhat concerning, the lack of regulatory awareness in this industry. If companies are operating in this market and don’t know what’s in their products, they should pull out.”
At the moment, there is no legal requirement or other incentive for manufacturers to go through their legacy submissions and resubmit them through the MHRA portal.
Bryan adds: “However, if the regulators and enforcement agencies did decide to use the new portal to review legacy data, we could see a massive change.
“They will catch up one day, so it’s a good idea to review your submissions. Brand owners have to ask themselves: do I want to be in the market in five years’ time?”
References:
- Arcus Compliance – https://arcuscompliance.com/
- UK Vaping Industry Association - https://www.ukvia.co.uk/
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Industry Licensing Scheme Proposed
A vape industry licensing scheme will generate £50m+ per year to combat underage and illicit vape sales according to industry experts
Be Vape Vigilant Success
The ‘Be Vape Vigilant’ national initiative has exposed more than 100 potential rogue vape traders says the UK Vaping Industry Association
UKVIA Writes To Sunak
The UKVIA has sent a letter to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to 'express profound dismay and disappointment' that the government has decided to proceed with a ban on disposable vapes
UKVIA’s Response to the Ban
John Dunne, Director General of the UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA) has issued a statement covering its take on the vape ban and other measures