The article(1) repeats the fact that vaping is vastly safer than smoking, stating that experts say vaping is at least 90% safer than smoking. It goes on to quote Professor Angel González Ureña, Professor Emeritus of Chemistry and director of the Department of Lasers and Molecular Beams of the Multidisciplinary Institute of the Complutense University, stating the streets of Madrid carry far greater danger than an electronic cigarette.
González Ureña explained that in several experiments, it the relative risk posed to drivers was "absolutely clear".
"We have conducted some experiments here in Madrid, analysing the gases on a normal street, because of traffic, and compared to e-cigarettes and I can tell them that for many chemists if you walk down any street you are exposed to more toxic than if you inhale an e-cigarette. That's for sure," he told COPE.
The piece goes on to cite Peter Harper, who is responsible for oncology at Guy's, King's and St Thomas hospitals in London and now provides advice to the French government on its strategy to combat cancer and tobacco related disease. He told COPE that city pollution causes more problems than the inhalation of ecig vapour.
Harper said the relative risk is simple to ascertain, "because of the absence of combustion" and the "very lower temperature".
"Reducing tobacco harm is not a theory,” Harper continued, “but an experimental fact based on chemical analysis using highly sensitive and high-resolution analytical techniques.”
He detailed how through the use of a gas chromatograph and a mass spectrometer, it has been demonstrated that the levels of toluene, o-xylene, 3R4F and nicotine itself are far lower in vapour than that found in cigarette smoke.
González Ureña went on to explain how the concept of second-hand vape danger didn’t exist because of the “low content in the expelled aerosol”, something Harper agreed with – although the latter did state that low risk didn’t mean no risk.
Their contribution to the debate in Spain will be welcome seeing as the nation has a poor approach to tobacco harm reduction. They called vaping, “the only way forward.”
References:
- Catedrático de química dice que ir por la calle en Madrid expone a más tóxicos que un cigarrillo electrónico - https://www.cope.es/actualidad/sociedad/noticias/catedratico-quimica-dice-que-por-calle-madrid-expone-mas-toxicos-que-cigarrillo-electronico-20210325_1208924
Photo Credit:
Madrid Image by David Mark from Pixabay
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
Irish Government Pauses New Vape Tax
Irish Minister for Finance Michael McGrath postponed the implementation of a vaping tax over concerns that it would discourage smokers who use e-cigarettes to quit smoking
WHO Told To Modernise Strategy
Modernise your tobacco control strategy, is the call being issued from ‘Quit For Good’ to those in charge at the World Health Organisation
ETHRA Writes to SANT Committee
European consumer advocacy umbrella organisation ETHRA has written to the SANT Committee on non-communicable diseases