Jamie Hartmann-Boyce and Nicola Lindson’s evidence review has led them to say that there is “greater confidence” that vaping works. They do mention that more data is required to cover modern devices.
Hartmann-Boyce has previously been funded to conduct research on behalf of the National Institute for Health Research, British Heart Foundation, and Cancer Research UK. Lindson has been funded by the National Institute for Health Research and Cancer Research UK.
Importantly, for those looking to switch or worrying due to coverage in the media, they say that there is “no evidence of serious harms” from vaping.
One of the problems frequently ignored by those who downplay vaping’s benefits is that smoking kills one in two regular users, which equates to 8 million people around the world every year – this is the same as over 21000 Boeing 747s crashing annually.
Hartmann-Boyce and Lindson write: “For many, the arrival of e-cigarettes signalled an exciting opportunity. E-cigarettes represented a new treatment for cigarette addiction, mimicking some of the behavioural, social and pharmacological aspects of cigarettes. But some policymakers remain cautious, despite the increase in research findings that support e-cigarettes for quitting smoking.”
They say the caution lying behind the restrictive practises are less to do with whether people should switch than concern over youth taking it up.
“Young people who use e-cigarettes are more likely to go on to smoke. Some interpret this data to mean that young people who would never smoke experiment with e-cigarettes become addicted to nicotine and then start smoking. In other words, some argue that e-cigarettes act as a gateway to smoking tobacco. Others argue that the link is instead due to commonalities between young people who would try e-cigarettes and try smoking regardless – the idea that: ‘kids who try things, try things’.”
They say this tension between public health experts over “protecting the kids” and “helping adults who smoke” has been obstructing “clear public health messaging for years.”
Ultimately, they conclude: “E-cigarettes with nicotine are not risk free but are considerably less harmful than smoking. Translated into actions: if you don’t smoke, don’t start to use e-cigarettes. If you do smoke, consider switching.”
Related:
- “Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation” by Hartmann-Boyce et al. – [link]
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia
A Missed Opportunity at COP10
The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives
COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction
Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10