The VTA “represents the manufacturers, wholesalers, small business owners and entrepreneurs who have developed innovative and quality vapor products, providing adult consumers with a better alternative to traditional combustible products.”
It says that it strives to:
- Promote greater public health through smart regulations and responsible public policies
- Transform the public debate around the vapor industry and dispel distorted and misleading information about vapor products
- Keep the vapor market open and competitive across the board
- Protect small business owners and their employees by ensuring the long-term viability of the vapor industry
Governor Cuomo has made it his mission to go after the vape industry over the last couple of years [link] [link], and once famously said: “Is vaping better than smoking? Technically, yes. But, so what?” [link]
Acting state Supreme Court Justice Catherine Cholakis made her ruling in favour of the VTA the other week, in relation to the emergency ban that preceded the eventual ban, declaring that the state had exceeded its authority. As a result, she decreed, New York has to reimburse the trade body.
Unfortunately, she noted: “[New York’s action] was in response to the serious problems of underage vaping and pulmonary illnesses traced to vaping. There can be no denying the seriousness of the health issues surrounding vaping. Concern for those issues, however, cannot excuse clearly unconstitutional action.”
She described the amount of money the VTA was asking for was “an eye-popping sum”, questioning how they managed to spend so much even factoring in the cost of litigation in New York.
People were quick to use the decision as threats against other governors seeking to enact similar measures.
Moose Joose Vape Shops warned Senator Ed McBroom: “I’m first in line to sue over regulatory taking of my business. Is Bloomberg going to give the state the $500M that it’s going to cost you to ban flavors? Governor Whitmer does Bloomberg’s bidding...please stand up for Michigan adults. If you allow a flavour ban, 500 stores will go under...it is a regulatory taking and would cost MI taxpayers between $250-$500 MILLION! My stores would cost $3million...and I’ll show/help EVERY VAPER how to make flavoured liquid, as would every other Michigan vape shop owner.”
Advocate Charles Gardner added: “Not to mention, the average US vape shop helps more than 5 smokers quit each month (most report much more than that). So, 500 Michigan vape shops help at least 30,000 Michigan smokers quit each year. Smoking kills people. 'Flavor' bans will just cause teen vapers to shift to smoking or THC.”
Related:
- Vapor Technology Association –[link]
Photo Credit:
Image by Horst Schwalm from Pixabay
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia
A Missed Opportunity at COP10
The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives
COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction
Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10