In 2016, the Cancer Centre at the University of Hawaii claimed to have found evidence proving vaping is a gateway for teens into smoking. It followed on the back of the first ban in the United States, where the state prohibited under-21s from owning or using electronic cigarette equipment to put the brakes on “out of control vaping”.
Professor Michael Siegel stated their results provided no evidence of any kind of relationship [link].
Frothing had reached fever pitch the next year. “Pick a popular spot for teens,” ran a television news article, “and you're likely to see them: E-cigarettes, being passed around like a bag of chips.” [link]
A couple of years on, the University of Hawaii’s Wills, Paganoa, Williams, and Tam were claiming their latest work was, “the first study to show a significant independent association of e-cigarette use with chronic respiratory disorder.”
They went on to say their findings also poured cold water on vaping “being used for smoking cessation by persons with existing respiratory disorder”.
Californian loon Stanton Glantz proclaimed the study to be ground-breaking. If that wasn’t enough to damn the work, Professor Michael Siegel pointed out that the authors ignored reporting any improvement in COPD as a result of smokers switching to vaping.
“It is biologically implausible that vaping for a few years can cause emphysema or chronic bronchitis. The unsupported, sweeping, hysterical conclusions being drawn from these studies are not just scientifically poor, they are causing harm to the public's health as well.” [link]
In March this year, politicians were seeking to ban the sale of flavoured vape products online or from stores, make a criminal out of anybody from eighteen to twenty-one years of age found to be carrying a vape device, and force schools to be responsible for collecting the then illegal devices and liquids.
By July, legislators had voted to push ahead with a bill [link] banning flavoured juices, criminalising vapers, and establishing a “tobacco education program” for miscreants seeking to use nicotine in reduced harm products.
Not content with corrupting science and promoting baseless lies about tobacco harm reduction, they are now going after Sylvia Luke, a member of the state House of Representatives.
Hawaiian media is reporting that she received $19,800 in campaign donations from tobacco companies and tobacco lobbyists. They are claiming that this was the reason she opposed anti-vape legislation in her position on the House Finance Committee.
The fact that these were legal donations and were declared in line with the regulations doesn’t seem to matter. What makes the situation even odder is that Luke actively supported the recent hard-line stance.
“We’re hoping that stronger, tougher penalties and confiscation is really the approach we need to take because we need to send a strong message,” she announced to waiting cameras after the July vote.
The only thing that is clear is that Hawaii stands to benefit from increased cigarette sales and truth no longer matters where vaping is concerned.
Related:
- Hawaii Lawmaker Spent Years Obstructing Vaping Regulation While Receiving Thousands From Big Tobacco – [link]
Photo Credit:
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia
A Missed Opportunity at COP10
The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives
COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction
Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10