Last November, YouTuber harm reduction advocate Matt Culley called the tax proposals “insane” and “the worst, most regressive war on drugs vaping bill I have seen”.
Professor Michael Siegel said: “This ban is going to cause many ex-smokers to return to cigarette smoking. Ex-smokers who rely upon flavoured e-liquids to stay off cigarettes are going to return to smoking in large numbers. The majority of those who don't will turn to black market e-liquids, and we all now understand the dangers of an unregulated black market.”
The bill that introduced the ban and tax also introduced swinging fines, with legislators believing that would act as a deterrent to illegal juice resellers.
The bill states: "A person who knowingly purchases or possesses an electronic nicotine delivery system not manufactured, purchased or imported by a licensed electronic nicotine delivery system distributor or licensed electronic nicotine delivery system retailer shall…be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for the first offense and not more than $25,000 for a second or subsequent offense."
Will these proposed fines curtail juice sales? Not according to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue’s Illegal Tobacco Task Force
The special agent in charge of the investigation for the task force gave testimony last month, and concluded that it will lead to, “an increase in smuggling activity and black-market sales.”
He continued: “I’m concerned that placing an added burden and tasking law enforcement with the enforcement of flavour bans will only stand to create a significant new black market, this includes both cross-state border smuggling and counterfeit tobacco. At the onset, you’ll start to see an increase between Massachusetts and New Hampshire in smuggling and illegal importation via the internet of counterfeit flavoured cigarettes from countries including China and Paraguay. They will skyrocket almost incredibly instantaneously.”
The furore surrounding the Vitamin E Acetate lung incidents last year, where people used illegal marijuana pods, was the driving force behind Massachusetts’ action – but they failed to appreciate that it was because a black market was operating and, in ushering in these swinging measure, they will create a brand new illicit market that will present its own problems.
It’s time for Massachusetts to have a ground-up rethink in how it approaches a reduction in tobacco-related harm, and it starts with embracing vape technology, not criminalising it.
Related:
Photo Credit:
Image by Clker-Free-Vector-Images from Pixabay
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Parliament Fears Two
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs faced questions from a Conservative MP and, oddly, a member of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
Sacrificing Health For 2p Cut
Tory Government alienates vaping voters with its mission to cut tax by an unaffordable 2p to attract voters by placing a tax on vape products in the forthcoming budget
Scotland Announces Single-Use Vape Action
A ban on the sale and supply of single-use vapes in Scotland is due to come into effect on 1 April 2025, under proposed legislation published today