No Waffle From Belgium
Psychology professor Frank Baeyens says that legally and politically treating vaping the same as tobacco products equality is “absolutely not a good thing”
-
by Dave Cross
Share on:
Frank Baeyens is a university professor of experimental psychology at the KU Leuven - University of Leuven. He has authored more than 100 scientific papers on human learning and on a variety of experimental psychopathology topics.
Recently, he has focused on the “contribution of learning processes to acquired likes, addiction and craving, and more specifically to smoking behaviour and recreational nicotine use”.
Professor Baeyens considers himself to be “a resolute advocate for Tobacco Harm Reduction”, and is currently investigating the efficacy, and the pro’s and con’s of electronic cigarettes, both in controlled lab studies and in clinical Randomized Controlled Trials.
Writing for DH Les Sports, a French-language news and sports daily newspaper published in Brussels, Baeyens says: “The Belgian government makes a big mistake by considering that the electronic cigarette is as harmful as the classic cigarette.”
He explains that the number of smokers has been decreasing in Belgium over a number of year but that “the current anti-smoking policy does not seem to accelerate the trend”.
If the government was serious about bringing down the number of smokers quickly, Baeyens continues, “the Belgian government will have to dare to bet on an expanded strategy for the consumption of tobacco and nicotine products.
“Discouraging smokers is not enough because the most inveterate of them do not care. To change their minds, the government must dare to actively promote attractive alternatives that are less harmful to health, and even promote electronic cigarettes. Maintaining a sanitary cordon around the consumption of nicotine, whatever its form, will not advance public health.”
Advocating a greater role for harm reduction, he states: “The method aims to significantly and quickly reduce the risk associated with the most harmful effects of smoking (such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, lung disease and psychological damage caused by stigma or discrimination). The rest is of less importance. The fact that people continue to use nicotine is certainly much less of a concern since it is much less harmful in itself.”
Belgium’s current direction of travel is relatively opposed to the principle of THR.
“Putting tobacco products and less harmful alternatives on the same level of legal and political equality is absolutely not a good thing. On the one hand, this reinforces the false impression that these two products are just as harmful as each other. So why would smokers opt for electronic cigarettes if it is as harmful as traditional cigarettes or if it has no positive effect on their health? On the other hand, this type of restrictive policy does not encourage smokers to turn to electronic cigarettes.”
Related:
- Frank Baeyens on Twitter – [link]
- Frank Baeyens at KU Leuven – [link]
- "Le gouvernement belge fait une grosse erreur en considérant que la cigarette électronique est aussi nocive que la cigarette classique", Frank Baeyens – [link]
Photo Credit:
Image by congerdesign from Pixabay
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
-
by Dave Cross
CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia
-
by Dave Cross
A Missed Opportunity at COP10
The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives
-
by Dave Cross
COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction
Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10
-
by Dave Cross
