Glantz Attacked
Vaping is so dangerous that people’s hearts are giving out up to ten years before they start using electronic cigarettes
-
by Dave Cross
Share on:
Glantz and his co-author Dharma Bhatta said vaping was “associated with” the doubling of risk of myocardial infarction (heart attacks). Away from his two papers, Glantz has stated absolutely that “e-cigs cause heart attacks”.
Professor Michael Siegel has previously stated that Glantz’ work is just “another crappy study … based on crappy science”.
“This is yet another example of the junk science that is rapidly being spewed out by anti-tobacco researchers who are apparently more interested in demonizing vaping than in using rigorous scientific reasoning. The problem with the study's conclusion is that this is a cross-sectional analysis and the researchers have no idea which came first: the vaping or the heart attack, heart disease, or depression.”
Professor Brad Rodu looked at the PATH study used by Glantz – what he discovered displays a shocking level of lying and amoral behavior by Bhatta and Glantz. Most of the patients involved in the work suffered their heart attack while they were smoking, BEFORE they started vaping. Moreover, the heart attacks happened up to ten years prior to switching to the reduced harm product.
Rodu, along with Nantaporn Plurphanswat, wrote: “Their analysis was an indefensible breach of any reasonable standard for research on association or causation. We urge you to take appropriate action on this article, including retraction."
Dr Konstantinos Farsalinos explains what Glantz and Bhatta did: “The study used data from the 1st wave of PATH. However, PATH has a question ‘How old were you when you were first told you had a heart attack (also called myocardial infarction) or needed bypass surgery?’ Interestingly, the authors of the study completely ignored this question.”
He continues: “This should not be considered a joke. It is a serious problem, a fatally flawed study that needs to be retracted immediately if the findings reported in the USA TODAY article are true. There are no ifs or buts, and there is no need for further comments or arguments. I need to emphasize: if the results reported in the USA TODAY article are true, the scientific community needs to protect itself from such a horrendous work that challenges the integrity and ethics of medicine.”
Professor Michael Siegel explained why Glantz’ work causes harm: “It is unfortunate that this crappy science is being reported at scientific conferences and in scientific journals. But what makes this a real tragedy is that this junk science is being used to justify policies to regulate vaping more harshly than smoking, by: (1) heavily taxing these products; (2) banning e-cigarette flavours; and/or (3) completely banning the sale of e-cigarettes in convenience stores.”
Resources:
- The Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study – [link]
- USA Today coverage – [link]
- Farsalinos on the research – [link]
- Michael Siegel, 2018 – [link]
- Glantz debunked by Siegel and Mendelsohn, 2018 – [link]
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
-
by Dave Cross
CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia
-
by Dave Cross
A Missed Opportunity at COP10
The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives
-
by Dave Cross
COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction
Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10
-
by Dave Cross
