THR Advocate Destroys Juul Study
A study focussing on Juul and high nicotine products was shared across many media platforms, but has been destroyed by a tobacco harm reduction advocate
-
by Dave Cross
Share on:
“Nicotine arms race: JUUL and the high-nicotine product market” concluded:
- JUUL has triggered a widespread rush among aerosol purveyors to market e-liquid in unprecedentedly high nicotine concentrations
- The rapidly rising popularity of high-nicotine e-liquids threatens to addict a generation of youth
- When sold in large quantity bottles (eg, 30 mL) they represent a childhood poisoning risk
- Labelling of nicotine concentration in e-liquids needs to be standardised to avoid consumer confusion
- The addictiveness and toxicity of these products makes it imperative that regulators act swiftly to enact protective measures
Jackler told reporters: “The rush to higher and higher nicotine concentration has reduced the cost of nicotine addiction and comes with a huge poisoning risk.”
Some bottles hold “enough nicotine to kill an entire preschool class,” he added.
Michelle Minton commented: “Wow, this study sounds worse than the ‘study’ by Petticrew et al on how the alcohol industry uses big tobacco tactics to ‘mislead’ public about alcohol related cancer risk.”
Amelia Howard opened: “First of all, no one knows what they're reporting on. This isn't like journalists not reading past an abstract or press release. They literally don't have a clue what the study is about. Not even a vague idea. And apparently every newsroom's solution to this problem was to guess.”
“The study is by Robert Jackler, a Stanford doctor who, by serendipity, managed to translate a compulsion to hoard tobacco marketing memorabilia into some sort of folk hero status in the anti-smoking movement. Jackler is an expert in cutting around people's salivary glands or something. But in tobacco research land, he fancies himself a historian who conducts cutting edge data science on Wednesdays. (On full moon dates, he dabbles in cultural sociology and communications studies.)”
“This is the definition of junk scientist, but he's tolerated, even indulged by many in tobacco control. Jackler also hates vaping. Every now and then he succeeds in placing an impenetrable piece of angry nonsense on evil ecig companies in the field's flagship journal.”
She calls the research objective “stupid”, and points out that it ignores the fact that nicotine was being used in devices predating Juul’s launch.
Then Amelia takes a pop at Jackler’s methodology: “Googling stuff. All of Jackler's ecig research is him gawking at stuff he digs up online that grosses him out, or gets him off, or both. And taking screen shots for his ‘studies,’ for his Angelfire website. Which I encourage everyone to go see - but not all at once, you'll crash the server.”
Her full takedown is linked to below, Amelia ends: “Sorry I was mean, I usually try not to be mean. There are good people working in tobacco control and a lot of them do good work. Maybe Jackler means well. But he's acting bad. It bothers me.”
Resources:
- “Nicotine arms race: JUUL and the high-nicotine product market” by Jackler and Ramamurthi - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054796
- Amelia’s comments via Thread reader - https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1093739512205783040.html
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
-
by Dave Cross
Longfills as an Alternative to Disposables
The disposable vape ban will impact many people, but there’s no reason to be concerned… Grab yourself a pod kit and a Longfill and you’ll be back to vaping the way you want to, just in a cheaper, more environmentally friendly and legal way.
COP10 is a Threat to Safer Nicotine Products
The EU obscures its position on low-risk alternatives to smoking before the WHO COP10 conference in Panama, starting Monday
-
by Dave Cross
Nicotine Is Not A Culprit
Planet of the Vapes has always encouraged smokers to use the quit product that works best for them, and snus is a product that seems to be unfairly blocked because it contains nicotine
-
by Dave Cross
-listing400.jpg)
