INNCO and the WHO
Consumer body INNCO has written to the World Health Organisation as it was unfairly blocked from attending the upcoming FCTC Conference of Parties.
-
by Dave Cross
Share on:
The FCTC treaty is a global treaty on tobacco control, and discussed by the 181 countries that have ratified it at the annual COP. This year is the eight COP – COP8 – and will be held from the 1-6 October in Switzerland, “it will focus on topics such as the shaping of a medium-term strategic framework, which will determine the actions to be taken by the Parties over the next five years, and the advances and challenges revealed in the ‘Global Progress Report on Implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control’.”
INNCO is not funded by or related in any way to any tobacco company or product. It is surprising that the organisation is banned from attending COP8 as an observer, to witness how our governments are acting and what arguments are being put forward to support decisions.
This is not surprising given the closed shop mentality that exists within the WHO. This year’s conference will spend a lot of time discussing the illicit trade in tobacco products – yet Interpol has also been banned from attending.
INNCO has sent a letter in order to convey its feelings on the matter. It states: “WHO should reject prohibition and acknowledge ‘tobacco harm reduction’ and risk-proportionate regulation of tobacco and nicotine products that do not involve combustion as part of an effective harm reduction strategy, which is required and defined by Article 1(d) of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Treaty (FCTC).”
The organisation expresses its concern that there is overt support for outright bans or over-regulation of low-risk alternatives like electronic cigarettes and snus, as well as other lower-risk products.
“We regard prohibition of these products as unethical, unscientific, damaging to public health and an irrational protection of the cigarette trade. We regard excessive regulation or taxation of [harm reduction products] as counterproductive and negligent as harm reduction is a human right. We believe that the FCTC mandate does not extend to [harm reduction products] since they are NOT tobacco products.”
INNCO demands that attending governments:
- Acknowledge that the use of harm reduction products are part of an effective harm reduction strategy
- Reverse the decision to encourage governments to restrict or ban the manufacture, importation or use of vaping products
- Confirm that all Parties to the FCTC should regulate harm reduction products separately to traditional combustible tobacco products
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
-
by Dave Cross
CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia
-
by Dave Cross
A Missed Opportunity at COP10
The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives
-
by Dave Cross
COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction
Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10
-
by Dave Cross
-listing400.jpg)
