The Richmond Times is to be praised for publishing a positive story by pro-active vaping company Avail Vapor LLC. Avail surveyed over eight thousand vapers to find out why, having quit, they continue to vape. So often public health campaigners easily dismiss our collective anecdotes, documenting them in the media is a good way to entrench the viewpoints.
Avail discovered that 94% of respondents were previously smokers, a finding that mirrors the multiple pieces of research conducted by Professor Robert West. Of these, 80% adopted vaping as a means to quit smoking – and 85% did successfully quit, a number far in excess of the success rates for traditional nicotine replacement products.
Of those who didn’t quit, a small number according to James Xu, the co-founder and co-owner of Avail, most had used ecigs to drastically reduce their consumption of cigarettes. Vaping is, according to Wu: “not a gateway to traditional smoking. The data shows it is a one-way street.”
In addition to quitting smoking, the survey highlighted the demand for flavours and the importance of allowing vapers the possibility to decide on their own nicotine strength.
Unfortunately the Times doesn’t appreciate that balance in an article is only valid if the balancing opinion is informed and valid. Their independent health policy consultant appeared ignorant of the research carried out to date and the news video contained factual errors.
The Kansas City News carries a far superior video, featuring Candi McCann (who runs her own vaping Youtube channel). “I’m not going to tell you this is healthy,” Candi tells the paper, “but I can tell you that it is 99 percent better for you than smoking.”
In addition to the health benefits and taste, highlighted so far, the second article extols the virtues of the customisability of what becomes a hobby and the sense of community that has grown between vapers. “There’s the social aspect that has seen some vaping stores, like Waldo Vapes on Wornall Road, becoming something akin to java-free coffee shops,” the journalist wrote, “where people gather to shoot the breeze, play games and challenge each other to see who can blow out the biggest cloud of scented vapour.”
But even this piece is ruined by so-called balance: “It is a way to get kids addicted to nicotine,” said a know-nothing rent-a-quote. “I’m concerned about the possibility of renormalizing behaviour.”
One thing we can always rely on, no matter what the main reason is for you wanting to vape – you can guarantee someone doesn’t like it.
So why do you vape? Let us know in the comments below!
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Irish Harm Reduction Idiocy
As it passes a law to ban the sale of vapes to under-18s, the Irish Health Minister announces that he plans to seek further restriction on vaping that will impact on adult vapers and smokers
Anti-Bans Petition
The UK Vaping Industry Association has launched a nationwide petition calling on the government not to introduce bans on vaping
Dental Experts Consider Pouches
Three dental experts have looked at tobacco-free nicotine pouches to see what benefits they offer quitting smokers or travelling vapers…and if they pose any risks
GSTHR Paper Explains COP10
The Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction project reminds advocates about the Briefing Paper explaining the WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and Conference of the Parties