A Taxing Issue
The U.S. House of Representatives’ Ways and Means Committee met recently to hear from experts about the impact of taxing vape products – then recommended doing it
-
by Dave Cross
Share on:
The committee was meeting to discuss a bill seeking to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a tax on nicotine used in vaping.
“E-cigarette taxes will increase the purchase and use of cigarettes”, Georgia State University economist Michael Pesko told the politicians.
“Our results suggest that while cigarette taxes reduce cigarette use, and e-cigarette taxes reduce e-cigarette use, they also have important interactions on each other. E-cigarettes and cigarettes are economic substitutes. So, if you raise the tax on one product, you will increase use of the other product.”
In addition to the potential for a future national tax on e-cigarettes, several states are adopting e-cigarette taxes. E-cigarette taxes started on Oct. 1 in Connecticut, Ohio, Washington and Wisconsin, and e-cigarette taxes are scheduled to be enacted on Jan. 1 in Maine and Nevada. This activity will bring to 20 the number of states with e-cigarette taxes.
“Despite the recent news about vaping deaths,” Pesko added, “e-cigarettes are thought to be only five percent as harmful as cigarettes for non-pregnant adults. Adopting a national e-cigarette tax proportional to the cigarette tax could harm public health by pushing people to use a more dangerous product – cigarettes.”
“Some people would argue that harshly regulating e-cigarettes is justified if e-cigarettes are a gateway to cigarette use, but the evidence does not back up that theory as youth cigarette use has been rapidly declining while e-cigarette use has been rising.”
The politicians didn’t listen and voted 24-15-1 in favour of recommending the passage of the bill.
American Vaping Association’s Greg Conley commented: “This $10 billion tax increase will harm public health by discouraging low-income adult smokers from switching to nicotine vaping. It will do nothing to stem the tide of contaminated illicit THC vaping products that are causing illnesses and deaths. Rather than slamming thousands of small businesses with a regressive tax hike that could make vaping more expensive than smoking cancer-causing cigarettes, Congress should be working to enact sensible regulations on both vaping products and marijuana.”
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Expert Reaction to Pregnancy Study
Experts have reacted to the QML study of impacts of vaping in pregnancy and comparison with smoking
-
by Dave Cross
Study: Vapes Help Pregnant Quitters
A new study from Queen Mary University of London finds that vapes help pregnant smokers quit and pose no risk of poor pregnancy outcomes
-
by Dave Cross
IBVTA responds to UCL study
The Independent British Vape Trade Association has responded to University College London research and said the findings show the Government’s smoke-free ambition is stalling
-
by Dave Cross
Cochrane Review Echoes Swedish Success
The Cochrane Review echoes the Swedish approach, finding less harmful alternatives like vaping are superior to other quit methods, says Smoke Free Sweden
-
by Dave Cross
-listing400.jpg)
