The researchers concluded: “E-cig users have higher odds of myocardial infarction, stroke, depression/anxiety/emotional problems, circulatory problems and lower risk of hypertension and diabetes compared to non-E-cigarette users.”
Some might be perplexed why they missed out higher probability of self-combustion, kidnapping by aliens and likelihood of having toast land butter-side down? Not Stanton Glantz. He ignored reasoned analysis and celebrated news that fell in line with his ideological campaign, “showing that e-cigarettes are a lot more dangerous than people used to think,” and repeating the lie that “e-cigarettes make it harder, not easier, to quit smoking.”
“Substantially more dangerous”? Really, Stanton?
Paris Without Tobacco’s Professor Dautzenberg said: “Definitively, Stanton Glantz confuses intimate conviction and science.”
“These data are a real wake-up call and should prompt more action and awareness about the dangers of e-cigarettes,” lead author Mohinder Vindhyal said in the press release. An announcement that formed the bulk of Sarah Knapton’s writing in The Daily Telegraph – but one she failed to copy-paste accurately.
She focussed on nonsense that vapers were 34% more likely to have a heart attack, 25% more likely to have coronary artery disease, and 55% more likely to suffer from depression or anxiety. Knapton failed to pay any attention to one particular sentence in the release: “There are some limitations. For example, the study design doesn’t allow researchers to establish causation.”
Sébastien Béziau, vice-president of the French VAPYOU advocacy group warned that relaying information like this simply scares smokers, increasing their risk of tobacco-related harm by preventing them from switching to vaping.
Michael Siegel has been justifiably less than diplomatic in his response: “This is yet another example of the junk science that is rapidly being spewed out by anti-tobacco researchers who are apparently more interested in demonizing vaping than in using rigorous scientific reasoning.”
“The problem with the study's conclusion is that this is a cross-sectional analysis and the researchers have no idea which came first: the vaping or the heart attack, heart disease, or depression.”
“It is unfortunate that this crappy science is being reported at scientific conferences and in scientific journals. But what makes this a real tragedy is that this junk science is being used to justify policies to regulate vaping more harshly than smoking, by: (1) heavily taxing these products; (2) banning e-cigarette flavours; and/or (3) completely banning the sale of e-cigarettes in convenience stores.”
“Rather than demonstrating that vaping causes heart attacks, heart disease, COPD, and depression, what these studies show is that when smokers get very sick, they are highly motivated to quit in order to save their lives, and many of them do so by switching to vaping.”
Resources:
- VAPYOU - https://www.vapyou.com/
- Stanton Glantz - https://tobacco.ucsf.edu/fourth-paper-links-ecigs-heart-attacks-and-stroke
- “Impact on Cardiovascular Outcomes Among E-Cigarette Users” by Vindhyal et al - https://www.abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/5758/presentation/48748
- ACC press release - https://www.acc.org/about-acc/press-releases/2019/03/07/10/03/ecigarettes-linked-to-heart-attacks-coronary-artery-disease-and-depression
- Daily Telegraph - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/03/07/vaping-raises-risk-having-heart-attack-biggest-ever-study-says/
- Michael Siegel - http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2019/03/purported-links-between-vaping-and.html
Dave Cross
Journalist at POTVDave is a freelance writer; with articles on music, motorbikes, football, pop-science, vaping and tobacco harm reduction in Sounds, Melody Maker, UBG, AWoL, Bike, When Saturday Comes, Vape News Magazine, and syndicated across the Johnston Press group. He was published in an anthology of “Greatest Football Writing”, but still believes this was a mistake. Dave contributes sketches to comedy shows and used to co-host a radio sketch show. He’s worked with numerous start-ups to develop content for their websites.
Join the discussion
Harm Reduction For The Rich
The United Kingdom risks becoming a harm reduction country only for the wealthy, according to Michael Landl of the World Vapers’ Alliance
CAPHRA Highlights Tobacco Control Flaws
The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates highlights the flaws in tobacco control which has led to the rise of black market in Australia
A Missed Opportunity at COP10
The Smoke Free Sweden movement says that COP10 was a missed opportunity to save millions of lives
COP10: Promote Tobacco Harm Reduction
Experts with Smoke Free Sweden are emphasising the urgent need for a Tobacco Harm Reduction approach at COP10